Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02710
Original file (BC 2013 02710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02710
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	XXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational 
benefits to his dependents.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was never given the opportunity to transfer his Post-9/11 GI 
Bill Educational benefits to his dependents prior to his 
retirement.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was retired from the Air Force in the grade of 
technical sergeant effective 1 Oct 2008.  He served 20 years and 
29 days of active service.

Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability:  Any member of the Armed 
Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on 
or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT says that the applicant 
provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the 
Air Force.  The program for transfer of benefits began on 1 Aug 
2009.  According to 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319 (f) (1) "an 
individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as 
a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed."  
The applicant was not on active duty on or after 1 Aug 2009, 
therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his 
dependents.

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 21 Jun 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02710 in Executive Session on 16 Apr 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

 , Panel Chair
 , Member
 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 May 2013.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 11 Jun 2013.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 2013.




                                    
                                   Panel Chair







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05696

    Original file (BC 2012 05696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05696 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. DPSIT states that the applicant retired effective 31 Jul 2009. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03263

    Original file (BC 2013 03263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The possibility exists that the applicant may not have received any information about the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and TEB program. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the applicant did not receive adequate counseling as required by law and DOD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the applicant’s request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03752

    Original file (BC 2012 03752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 29 Aug 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02949

    Original file (BC 2013 02949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While on active duty he was instructed by the Education Office that the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) had to be accomplished while he was on active duty. However, the Board may approve the applicant’s request if they find there was an injustice to the extent the applicant did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling as required by law and DoD regulation and that he was not personally...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03973

    Original file (BC 2013 03973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03973 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents be corrected to 9 Apr 2018 [sic]. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02016

    Original file (BC-2012-02016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02961

    Original file (BC 2013 02961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02961 in Executive Session on 28 May 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2013-02961 was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350

    Original file (BC-2012-01350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01799

    Original file (BC-2012-01799.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01799 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. 2 If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...